My own religious tradition has its share of gruesome stories: a faithful servant who carried the dismembered arms of the sheep rustlers to the king; a bridge over a river made by piling up the bodies of the dead; a headless body lifting itself upright before collapsing, dead. The veneration of the Sikh gurus and the bloody depictions of their martyrdom hanging in a dining room carries through this odd tradition. I was fascinated by the stories, so I looked them up.
Guru Arjun Dev was brought before the courts on charges of trying to lead Muslims away from their religion. He was given the choice between conversion or martyrdom, and chose to die for his religion. He was tortured to death. Guru Teg Bahadur watched three of his disciples martyred before he was beheaded, sealing his own devotion to Sikhism with his life. Pictures of the gruesome deaths of these and other Sikh martyrs are easy to find on the internet, along with graphic stories about the inhumanity of men in the throes of religious fanaticism. But the Sikhs do not have a tradition of blood sacrifice to God. Can these martyrs be considered sacrificial lambs, so to speak? Did their deaths make a difference in their afterlife?
Guru Nanak taught complete devotion to God and His teachings to reach Moksha. Truly selfless attitudes were necessary to attain the goal of human life. He also taught rejection of Hindu and Islam teachings, saying he had the only path to God, and he knew the only true God. It would seem that choosing to die for Sikhism rather than convert to untrue religions would indeed be a righteous act. Unwavering, undivided devotion to God certainly are part of Guru Nanak’s teaching, and martyrdom demonstrates unwavering devotion.
Guru Gobind Singh actually called for men willing to die to demonstrate devotion to God. He asked for volunteers who would be willing to die for the faith. The first volunteer was taking into a tent behind Guru Gobind Singh, the onlookers heard the drawing of a sword, and the Guru emerged with a bloody sword. Even in the face of this almost certain evidence that the volunteer was killed, four other men volunteered to die for their religion. When these men walked out of the tent, alive and whole, Guru Gobind Singh made them leaders of the Khalsa, demonstrating clearly that rewards follow sacrifice of life.
Guru Nanak taught the importance of living life the way God commands, learning selfless love for fellow humans. Martyrdom is not seen as a sacrament in the Sikh tradition. My original assumption that martyrdom was related to blood sacrifice is not true here. Perhaps living life in spite of persecution, never wavering from the path Guru Nanak prescribed, equally demonstrates devotion to God. The point is not that these people died for their religion, but that they were willing to take on whatever life brought to them without departing or doubting the teachings of the Gurus.
Seen in this light, martyrdom can be considered one of many ways to demonstrate righteousness. Dying may not earn any more grace from God than other ways of showing devotion. It is not the sacrifice of the Gurus that shows followers how to live, but the lives and teachings of the Gurus.